GeForce GT 625 vs GeForce GTS 350M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 625 vs GeForce GTS 350M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 625 vs GeForce GTS 350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 625

2010

Why buy it

✅17.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌88.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 106W.

GeForce GTS 350M

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 106W instead of 200W, a 94W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 625 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 625 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTS 350M instead at 381 vs 375, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 625 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 625 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GT 625 vs GeForce GTS 350M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 625

The GeForce GT 625 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $279.

GeForce GTS 350M

The GeForce GTS 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $129.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 625 scores 375 and the GeForce GTS 350M reaches 381 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 625 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTS 350M uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GT 625) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 350M). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 625) vs 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 350M).

Feature	GeForce GT 625	GeForce GTS 350M
G3D Mark Score	375	381+2%
Architecture	Fermi	Fermi
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	352+83%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8554 TFLOPS+42%	0.6013 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	44+38%	32
L1 Cache	704 KB+175%	256 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 625	GeForce GTS 350M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 625 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 350M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 625) vs 256 KB (GeForce GTS 350M) — the GeForce GT 625 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 625	GeForce GTS 350M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 625) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GTS 350M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 625	GeForce GTS 350M
DirectX	12 (11_0)+8%	11.1 (10_1)
OpenGL	4.6+119%	2.1
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 625) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 350M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 625) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTS 350M).

Feature	GeForce GT 625	GeForce GTS 350M
Encoder	None	PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP5)	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 625 draws 200W versus the GeForce GTS 350M's 106W — a 61.4% difference. The GeForce GTS 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 625) vs 350W (GeForce GTS 350M). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 85°C.