CPU
GPU
GeForce 8800M GTS
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 625
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 625
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8800M GTS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 625 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 8800M GTS | GeForce GT 625 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 8800M GTS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8800M GTS and GeForce GT 625
GeForce 8800M GTS
The GeForce 8800M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points.
GeForce GT 625
The GeForce GT 625 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8800M GTS scores 382 and the GeForce GT 625 reaches 375 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800M GTS is built on G9x while the GeForce GT 625 uses Fermi, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs 352 (GeForce GT 625).
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTS | GeForce GT 625 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 382+2% | 375 |
| Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 352+57% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTS | GeForce GT 625 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8800M GTS comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 625 has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 625 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTS | GeForce GT 625 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 625). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTS | GeForce GT 625 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 12 (11_0)+20% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs None (GeForce GT 625). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD (VP5). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 625).
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTS | GeForce GT 625 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | PureVideo HD (VP5) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8800M GTS draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 625's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce 8800M GTS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs 250W (GeForce GT 625). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTS | GeForce GT 625 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 70-26% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.5+32% | 1.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 625 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTS | GeForce GT 625 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $60 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $15 |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GF100 |
| Release | July 15 2008 | May 31 2010 |
| Ranking | #825 | #618 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 8800M GTS and GeForce GT 625
