GeForce 8800M GTS vs GeForce GT 625

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8800M GTS vs GeForce GT 625 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8800M GTS vs GeForce GT 625: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8800M GTS

2008

Why buy it

✅14.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

GeForce GT 625

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 8800M GTS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 8800M GTS is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (382 vs 375), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 8800M GTS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 625 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 625 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 8800M GTS has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 8800M GTS vs GeForce GT 625 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8800M GTS

The GeForce 8800M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points.

GeForce GT 625

The GeForce GT 625 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $279.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8800M GTS scores 382 and the GeForce GT 625 reaches 375 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800M GTS is built on G9x while the GeForce GT 625 uses Fermi, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs 352 (GeForce GT 625).

Feature	GeForce 8800M GTS	GeForce GT 625
G3D Mark Score	382+2%	375
Architecture	G9x	Fermi
Process Node	65 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	224	352+57%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 8800M GTS	GeForce GT 625
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8800M GTS has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 625 carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 625 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 8800M GTS and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 625.

Feature	GeForce 8800M GTS	GeForce GT 625
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 625). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 8800M GTS	GeForce GT 625
DirectX	10.0	12 (11_0)+20%
Vulkan	None	N/A
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs None (GeForce GT 625). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD (VP5). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 625).

Feature	GeForce 8800M GTS	GeForce GT 625
Encoder	No	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP2	PureVideo HD (VP5)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8800M GTS draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 625's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce 8800M GTS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs 250W (GeForce GT 625). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 70.

Feature	GeForce 8800M GTS	GeForce GT 625
TDP	150W-25%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	250W-29%
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Length	0mm	168mm
Height	0mm	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	95°C	70-26%
Perf/Watt	2.5+32%	1.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 625 (2010 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 8800M GTS	GeForce GT 625
MSRP	—	$60
Codename	NB9E-GTX	GF100
Release	July 15 2008	May 31 2010
Ranking	#825	#618

Search GeForce 8800M GTS on Amazon

Search GeForce GT 625 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.