GeForce GT 625 vs Radeon HD 4670
GeForce GT 625
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 4670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 625 is positioned at rank 195 and the Radeon HD 4670 is on rank 208, so the GeForce GT 625 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 625
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4670
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 4670 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 625.
| Insight | GeForce GT 625 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 625 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 625 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $67), it costs 78% less, resulting in a 338.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 625 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+338.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($67) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 625 and Radeon HD 4670
GeForce GT 625
The GeForce GT 625 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $279.
Radeon HD 4670
The Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 625 scores 375 and the Radeon HD 4670 reaches 382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 625 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GT 625) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 4670). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 625) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4670).
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 375 | 382+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 1536+336% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+216% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 44 | 96+118% |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+267% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 625) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4670). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+19% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 625) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 4670).
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP5) | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 625 draws 200W versus the Radeon HD 4670's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GT 625 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 625) vs 300W (Radeon HD 4670). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 193mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-17% | 300W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 168mm | 193mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 65°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.9+27% | 1.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 625 launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon HD 4670 launched at $67 and now averages $67. The GeForce GT 625 costs 77.6% less ($52 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.0 (GeForce GT 625) vs 5.7 (Radeon HD 4670) — the GeForce GT 625 offers 338.6% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-10% | $67 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-78% | $67 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.0+339% | 5.7 |
| Codename | GF100 | Cayman |
| Release | May 31 2010 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #618 | #596 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 625 and Radeon HD 4670
