
GeForce GT 625

Radeon HD 4670
GeForce GT 625 vs Radeon HD 4670 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 625 vs Radeon HD 4670 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 625 vs Radeon HD 4670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 625
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 193mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 4670
2010Why buy it
- ✅17.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌11.7% HIGHER MSRP$67 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
- ❌14.9% longer card at 193mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 625 vs Radeon HD 4670 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 625
The GeForce GT 625 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon HD 4670
The Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 625 scores 375 and the Radeon HD 4670 reaches 382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 625 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GT 625) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 4670). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 625) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4670).
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 375 | 382+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 1536+336% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+216% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 44 | 96+118% |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+267% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 625 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4670 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 625 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 4670.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 625) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4670). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+19% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 625) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 4670).
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP5) | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 625 draws 200W versus the Radeon HD 4670's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GT 625 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 625) vs 300W (Radeon HD 4670). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 193mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-17% | 300W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 168mm | 193mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 65°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.9+27% | 1.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 625 came in at $60, while the Radeon HD 4670 launched at $67. On MSRP, GeForce GT 625 was 10.4% cheaper ($7 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.3 (GeForce GT 625) vs 5.7 (Radeon HD 4670) — the GeForce GT 625 offers 10.5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-10% | $67 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3+11% | 5.7 |
| Codename | GF100 | Cayman |
| Release | May 31 2010 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #618 | #596 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














