GeForce GT 625 vs GeForce GTX 260M
GeForce GT 625
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 260M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 625 is positioned at rank 195 and the GeForce GTX 260M is on rank 134, so the GeForce GTX 260M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 625
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 260M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 260M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 625.
| Insight | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 260M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 625 and GeForce GTX 260M
GeForce GT 625
The GeForce GT 625 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $279.
GeForce GTX 260M
The GeForce GTX 260M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 182W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 625 scores 375 and the GeForce GTX 260M reaches 382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 625 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 260M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GT 625) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 260M). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 625) vs 0.4769 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 260M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 375 | 382+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 352+83% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS+79% | 0.4769 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+14% | 28 |
| TMUs | 44 | 64+45% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+129% | 224 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 625) vs 224 KB (GeForce GTX 260M) — the GeForce GT 625 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+129% | 224 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 625) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 260M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+8% | 11.1 (10_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 625) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 260M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 625) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 260M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP5) | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 625 draws 200W versus the GeForce GTX 260M's 182W — a 9.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 260M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 625) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 260M). Power connectors: None vs None. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 182W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.9 | 2.1+11% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 625 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | — |
| Codename | GF100 | GT200 |
| Release | May 31 2010 | June 16 2008 |
| Ranking | #618 | #821 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 625 and GeForce GTX 260M
