
GeForce GT 625

GeForce GT 705
GeForce GT 625 vs GeForce GT 705 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 625 vs GeForce GT 705 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 625 vs GeForce GT 705: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 625
2010Why buy it
- ✅45.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌212.5% higher power demand at 200W vs 64W.
- ❌15.9% longer card at 168mm vs 145mm.
GeForce GT 705
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 64W instead of 200W, a 136W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 168mm, a 23mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 625 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 625 vs GeForce GT 705 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 625
The GeForce GT 625 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $279.

GeForce GT 705
The GeForce GT 705 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 370 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 625 scores 375 and the GeForce GT 705 reaches 370 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 625 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GT 705 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GT 625) vs 384 (GeForce GT 705). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 625) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 705).
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GT 705 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 375+1% | 370 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 384+9% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS+12% | 0.7626 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 44+38% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+2100% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GT 705 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 625 and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 705. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 625) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 705) — the GeForce GT 625 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GT 705 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 625) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 705). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GT 705 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+12% | 4.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 625) vs No (GeForce GT 705). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 625) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 705).
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GT 705 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP5) | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 625 draws 200W versus the GeForce GT 705's 64W — a 103% difference. The GeForce GT 705 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 625) vs 250W (GeForce GT 705). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GT 705 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 64W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 250W | 250W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 168mm | 145mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 65°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.9 | 5.8+205% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 625 came in at $60, while the GeForce GT 705 launched at $60. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.3 (GeForce GT 625) vs 6.2 (GeForce GT 705) — the GeForce GT 625 offers 1.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 705 (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GT 705 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3+2% | 6.2 |
| Codename | GF100 | GK107 |
| Release | May 31 2010 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #618 | #777 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














