GeForce GT 705 vs Quadro FX 2700M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 705 vs Quadro FX 2700M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 705 vs Quadro FX 2700M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 705

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 64W instead of 189W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 2700M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 2700M

2008

Why buy it

✅39.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
❌195.3% higher power demand at 189W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 2700M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 39.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 705 instead at 370 vs 367, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 705 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 705 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro FX 2700M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 705 vs Quadro FX 2700M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 705

The GeForce GT 705 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 370 points. Launch price was $89.

Quadro FX 2700M

The Quadro FX 2700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 367 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 705 scores 370 and the Quadro FX 2700M reaches 367 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 705 is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 2700M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 705) vs 240 (Quadro FX 2700M). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 705) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2700M).

Feature	GeForce GT 705	Quadro FX 2700M
G3D Mark Score	370	367
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS+23%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 705 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 2700M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 705	Quadro FX 2700M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 705 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2700M carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 705 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 705 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2700M.

Feature	GeForce GT 705	Quadro FX 2700M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 705 draws 64W versus the Quadro FX 2700M's 189W — a 98.8% difference. The GeForce GT 705 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 705) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2700M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GT 705	Quadro FX 2700M
TDP	64W-66%	189W
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	145mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	5.8+205%	1.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 705 (2014 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce GT 705	Quadro FX 2700M
MSRP	$60	—
Codename	GK107	GT200B
Release	May 29 2014	November 11 2008
Ranking	#777	#815

Search GeForce GT 705 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 2700M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.