GeForce GT 705 vs Radeon HD 6490M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 705

2014Core: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6490M

2011Core: 680 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 705 vs Radeon HD 6490M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 705 vs Radeon HD 6490M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 705 vs Radeon HD 6490M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 705

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 64W instead of 75W, a 11W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6490M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6490M

2011

Why buy it

  • 56.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • 17.2% higher power demand at 75W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6490M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 56.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (378 vs 370), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 705 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 705 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6490M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 705 vs Radeon HD 6490M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 705

The GeForce GT 705 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 370 points. Launch price was $89.

AMD

Radeon HD 6490M

The Radeon HD 6490M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 378 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 705 scores 370 and the Radeon HD 6490M reaches 378 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 705 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6490M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 705) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6490M). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 705) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6490M).

FeatureGeForce GT 705Radeon HD 6490M
G3D Mark Score
370
378+2%
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
960+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS
1.306 TFLOPS+71%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
48+50%
L1 Cache
32 KB
192 KB+500%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 705 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6490M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 705Radeon HD 6490M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 705 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6490M carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 705 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 705 and System on the Radeon HD 6490M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 705) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6490M) — the Radeon HD 6490M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 705Radeon HD 6490M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 705 draws 64W versus the Radeon HD 6490M's 75W — a 15.8% difference. The GeForce GT 705 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 705) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6490M). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GT 705Radeon HD 6490M
TDP
64W-15%
75W
Recommended PSU
250W-29%
350W
Power Connector
None
1x 6-pin
Length
145mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
5.8+16%
5.0
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 705 (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GT 705Radeon HD 6490M
MSRP
$60
Codename
GK107
Blackcomb
Release
May 29 2014
January 4 2011
Ranking
#777
#654

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.