GeForce GT 705 vs Radeon HD4670 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 705 vs Radeon HD4670 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 705 vs Radeon HD4670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 705
2014Why buy it
- β Costs $7 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
- β Delivers 12.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- β Draws 64W instead of 250W, a 186W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Radeon HD4670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD4670
2010Why buy it
- β 51.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β11.7% HIGHER MSRP$67 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- β290.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 64W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 705 vs Radeon HD4670 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 705
The GeForce GT 705 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 370 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon HD4670
The Radeon HD4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 366 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 705 scores 370 and the Radeon HD4670 reaches 366 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 705 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 705) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD4670). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 705) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD4670).
| Feature | GeForce GT 705 | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 370+1% | 366 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1536+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+254% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 96+200% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 192 KB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 705 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD4670 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 705 | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 705 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD4670 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 705 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 705 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD4670. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 705) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD4670) β the Radeon HD4670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 705 | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 705 draws 64W versus the Radeon HD4670's 250W β a 118.5% difference. The GeForce GT 705 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 705) vs 300W (Radeon HD4670). Power connectors: None vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GT 705 | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W-74% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-17% | 300W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 145mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 65Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 5.8+287% | 1.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 705 came in at $60, while the Radeon HD4670 launched at $67. On MSRP, GeForce GT 705 was 10.4% cheaper ($7 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.2 (GeForce GT 705) vs 5.5 (Radeon HD4670) β the GeForce GT 705 offers 12.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 705 (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GT 705 | Radeon HD4670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-10% | $67 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.2+13% | 5.5 |
| Codename | GK107 | Cayman |
| Release | May 29 2014 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #777 | #596 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















