GeForce GT 705 vs GeForce GTX 260M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 705 vs GeForce GTX 260M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 705 vs GeForce GTX 260M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 705

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 64W instead of 182W, a 118W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 260M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTX 260M

2008

Why buy it

✅47.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
❌184.4% higher power demand at 182W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 260M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 47.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (382 vs 370), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 705 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 65nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 705 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 260M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 705 vs GeForce GTX 260M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 705

The GeForce GT 705 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 370 points. Launch price was $89.

GeForce GTX 260M

The GeForce GTX 260M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 182W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 705 scores 370 and the GeForce GTX 260M reaches 382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 705 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 260M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 705) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 260M). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 705) vs 0.4769 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 260M).

Feature	GeForce GT 705	GeForce GTX 260M
G3D Mark Score	370	382+3%
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	65 nm
Shading Units	384+100%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS+60%	0.4769 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	28+75%
TMUs	32	64+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB+14%	224 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 705	GeForce GTX 260M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 705 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 260M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 705) vs 224 KB (GeForce GTX 260M) — the GeForce GT 705 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 705	GeForce GTX 260M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB+14%	224 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 705) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 260M). OpenGL: 4.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 705	GeForce GTX 260M
DirectX	11.0	11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL	4.1+24%	3.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 705) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 260M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 705) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 260M).

Feature	GeForce GT 705	GeForce GTX 260M
Encoder	No	PureVideo HD VP2
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 705 draws 64W versus the GeForce GTX 260M's 182W — a 95.9% difference. The GeForce GT 705 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 705) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 260M). Power connectors: None vs None. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 705	GeForce GTX 260M
TDP	64W-65%	182W
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	None	None
Length	145mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	65°C-24%	85°C
Perf/Watt	5.8+176%	2.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 705 (2014 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce GT 705	GeForce GTX 260M
MSRP	$60	—
Codename	GK107	GT200
Release	May 29 2014	June 16 2008
Ranking	#777	#821

Search GeForce GT 705 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 260M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.