
GeForce GT 705

Quadro FX 3700
GeForce GT 705 vs Quadro FX 3700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 705 vs Quadro FX 3700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 705 vs Quadro FX 3700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 705
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,539 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2550.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 64W instead of 189W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 229mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 3700
2008Why buy it
- ✅39.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌2565% HIGHER MSRP$1,599 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ❌195.3% higher power demand at 189W vs 64W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 705 vs Quadro FX 3700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 705
The GeForce GT 705 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 370 points. Launch price was $89.

Quadro FX 3700
The Quadro FX 3700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 705 scores 370 and the Quadro FX 3700 reaches 372 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 705 is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 3700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 705) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3700). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 705) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700).
| Feature | GeForce GT 705 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 370 | 372 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+60% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS+23% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 705 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 3700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 705 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 705 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3700 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 705 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 705 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3700.
| Feature | GeForce GT 705 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 705) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 3700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 705 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0+10% | 10_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 705 draws 64W versus the Quadro FX 3700's 189W — a 98.8% difference. The GeForce GT 705 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 705) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3700). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 705 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W-66% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.8+190% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 705 came in at $60, while the Quadro FX 3700 launched at $1599. On MSRP, GeForce GT 705 was 96.2% cheaper ($1539 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.2 (GeForce GT 705) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 3700) — the GeForce GT 705 offers 3000% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 705 (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GT 705 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-96% | $1599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.2+3000% | 0.2 |
| Codename | GK107 | GT200B |
| Release | May 29 2014 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #777 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














