Quadro FX 3400/4400 vs GeForce 8400M G
Quadro FX 3400/4400
Popular choices:
GeForce 8400M G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is positioned at rank 421 and the GeForce 8400M G is on rank 635, so the Quadro FX 3400/4400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3400/4400
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400M G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 8400M G is significantly newer (2014 vs 2008). The GeForce 8400M G likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 3400/4400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8400M G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 3400/4400 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3400/4400 | GeForce 8400M G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 8400M G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 8400M G holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $50), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 152.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3400/4400 | GeForce 8400M G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+152.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3400/4400 and GeForce 8400M G
Quadro FX 3400/4400
The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points. Launch price was $1,799.
GeForce 8400M G
The GeForce 8400M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 3400/4400 scores 104 and the GeForce 8400M G reaches 105 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 8400M G uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 3400/4400) vs 384 (GeForce 8400M G). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3400/4400) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M G).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3400/4400 | GeForce 8400M G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 104 | 105 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4623 TFLOPS | 0.8632 TFLOPS+87% |
| ROPs | 24+200% | 8 |
| TMUs | 64+300% | 16 |
| L2 Cache | 0.19 MB | 1 MB+426% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3400/4400 | GeForce 8400M G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 3400/4400 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8400M G has 128 MB. The Quadro FX 3400/4400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 3400/4400) vs 1 MB (GeForce 8400M G) — the GeForce 8400M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3400/4400 | GeForce 8400M G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.19 MB | 1 MB+426% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3400/4400 draws 150W versus the GeForce 8400M G's 33W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 8400M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3400/4400) vs 350W (GeForce 8400M G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3400/4400 | GeForce 8400M G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 33W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 3.2+357% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 3400/4400 launched at $1799 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce 8400M G launched at $50 and now averages $20. The GeForce 8400M G costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.1 (Quadro FX 3400/4400) vs 5.3 (GeForce 8400M G) — the GeForce 8400M G offers 152.4% better value. The GeForce 8400M G is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3400/4400 | GeForce 8400M G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1799 | $50-97% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $20-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1 | 5.3+152% |
| Codename | GT200B | GM108 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | March 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #884 | #854 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 3400/4400 and GeForce 8400M G
