Quadro FX 3400/4400 vs Quadro FX 4000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is positioned at rank 421 and the Quadro FX 4000 is on rank 423, so the Quadro FX 3400/4400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3400/4400

#405

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

246217%

#420

Quadro FX 1300

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

100%

#421

Quadro FX 3400/4400

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50

100%

#422

Quadro FX 4000

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50

83%

#423

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

67%

#424

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

33%

#425

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

17%

#426

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4000

#408

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

295460%

#423

Quadro FX 4000

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50

100%

#424

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

80%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

40%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

20%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 4000.

Insight	Quadro FX 3400/4400	Quadro FX 4000
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro FX 3400/4400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 3400/4400 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro FX 3400/4400	Quadro FX 4000
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+3%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 3400/4400 Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 4000 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3400/4400 and Quadro FX 4000

Quadro FX 3400/4400

The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Quadro FX 4000

The Quadro FX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 101 points. Launch price was $1,799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3400/4400 scores 104 and the Quadro FX 4000 reaches 101 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 4000 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 3400/4400) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4000). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3400/4400) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4000).

Feature	Quadro FX 3400/4400	Quadro FX 4000
G3D Mark Score	104+3%	101
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	192	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	24	24
TMUs	64	64
L2 Cache	192 KB	192 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3400/4400	Quadro FX 4000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Quadro FX 3400/4400	Quadro FX 4000
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	192 KB	192 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3400/4400 draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 4000's 150W — a 0% difference. The Quadro FX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3400/4400) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX 3400/4400	Quadro FX 4000
TDP	150W	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	0.7	0.7

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 3400/4400 launched at $1799 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro FX 4000 launched at $2199 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.1 (Quadro FX 3400/4400) vs 2.0 (Quadro FX 4000) — the Quadro FX 3400/4400 offers 5% better value.