Quadro FX 3400/4400 vs Quadro FX 4000

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3400/4400

2008Core: 602 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4000

2008Core: 602 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 3400/4400 vs Quadro FX 4000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3400/4400 vs Quadro FX 4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3400/4400 vs Quadro FX 4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3400/4400

2008

Why buy it

  • Costs $400 less on MSRP ($1,799 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 25.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 4000

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 22.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,199 MSRPvs$1,799 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 3400/4400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3% in PassMark G3D (104 vs 101), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 3400/4400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 3400/4400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $400 cheaper on MSRP at $1,799 vs $2,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 25.9% (0.1 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro FX 3400/4400 vs Quadro FX 4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3400/4400

The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points. Launch price was $1,799.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4000

The Quadro FX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 101 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3400/4400 scores 104 and the Quadro FX 4000 reaches 101 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 4000 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 3400/4400) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4000). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3400/4400) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4000).

FeatureQuadro FX 3400/4400Quadro FX 4000
G3D Mark Score
104+3%
101
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
192
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4623 TFLOPS
0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs
24
24
TMUs
64
64
L2 Cache
192 KB
192 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 3400/4400Quadro FX 4000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3400/4400 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4000.

FeatureQuadro FX 3400/4400Quadro FX 4000
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
192 KB
192 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3400/4400 draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 4000's 150W — a 0% difference. The Quadro FX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3400/4400) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro FX 3400/4400Quadro FX 4000
TDP
150W
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
0.7
0.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 3400/4400 came in at $1799, while the Quadro FX 4000 launched at $2199. On MSRP, Quadro FX 3400/4400 was 18.2% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (Quadro FX 3400/4400) vs 0.0 (Quadro FX 4000) — the Quadro FX 3400/4400 offers 100+% better value.

FeatureQuadro FX 3400/4400Quadro FX 4000
MSRP
$1799-18%
$2199
Performance per Dollar
0.1
0.0
Codename
GT200B
GT200B
Release
November 11 2008
November 11 2008
Ranking
#884
#884

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.