Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Quadro FX 3400/4400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Quadro FX 3400/4400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Quadro FX 3400/4400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 3500.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 3400/4400

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
3571.4% HIGHER MSRP
$1,799 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 3400/4400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (104 vs 102), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2009 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,750 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $1,799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3500.8% (2.1 vs 0.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 3400/4400 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Quadro FX 3400/4400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.

Quadro FX 3400/4400

The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points. Launch price was $1,799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT scores 102 and the Quadro FX 3400/4400 reaches 104 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is built on TeraScale while the Quadro FX 3400/4400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 192 (Quadro FX 3400/4400). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3400/4400).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Quadro FX 3400/4400
G3D Mark Score	102	104+2%
Architecture	TeraScale	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	800 ×2+317%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.88 TFLOPS ×2+90%	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	16 ×2	24+50%
TMUs	40 ×2	64+60%
L2 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Quadro FX 3400/4400
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3400/4400. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 3400/4400) — the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Quadro FX 3400/4400
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 3400/4400's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3400/4400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Quadro FX 3400/4400
TDP	30W-80%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	3.4+386%	0.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT came in at $49, while the Quadro FX 3400/4400 launched at $1799. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT was 97.3% cheaper ($1750 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 0.1 (Quadro FX 3400/4400) — the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT offers 2000% better value. The newer card here is Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT (2009 vs 2008).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Quadro FX 3400/4400
MSRP	$49-97%	$1799
Performance per Dollar	2.1+2000%	0.1
Codename	M98	GT200B
Release	January 9 2009	November 11 2008
Ranking	#818	#884

Search Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 3400/4400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.