CPU
GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6290
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is positioned at rank 637 and the Radeon HD 6290 is on rank 313, so the Radeon HD 6290 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6290
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6290 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6290 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6290 holds the technical lead. Priced at $49 (vs $50), it costs 2% less, resulting in a 0.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT and Radeon HD 6290
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.
Radeon HD 6290
The Radeon HD 6290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT scores 102 and the Radeon HD 6290 reaches 105 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 6290 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6290). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6290).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 102 | 105+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 ×2 | 1536 ×2+92% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 | 2.55 TFLOPS ×2+190% |
| ROPs | 16 ×2 | 32 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 40 ×2 | 96 ×2+140% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 384 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6290 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 6290 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6290) — the Radeon HD 6290 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6290). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.2+12% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 1.0 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6290).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo HD | — |
| Decoder | UVD 1.0 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 6290's 375W — a 170.4% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6290). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 65°C.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-92% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 65°C-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.4+1033% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon HD 6290 launched at $50 and now averages $50. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT costs 2% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 2.1 (Radeon HD 6290) — the Radeon HD 6290 offers 0% better value. The Radeon HD 6290 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-2% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-2% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Codename | M98 | Antilles |
| Release | January 9 2009 | March 8 2011 |
| Ranking | #818 | #583 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT and Radeon HD 6290
