G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Radeon HD 6290 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Radeon HD 6290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 375W, a 345W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2009 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6290

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌1150% higher power demand at 375W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6290 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (105 vs 102), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6290 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 more expensive on MSRP at $50 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.9% (2.1 vs 2.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6290 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Radeon HD 6290 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.

Radeon HD 6290

The Radeon HD 6290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT scores 102 and the Radeon HD 6290 reaches 105 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 6290 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6290). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6290).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon HD 6290
G3D Mark Score	102	105+3%
Architecture	TeraScale	TeraScale 3
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	800 ×2	1536 ×2+92%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.88 TFLOPS ×2	2.55 TFLOPS ×2+190%
ROPs	16 ×2	32 ×2+100%
TMUs	40 ×2	96 ×2+140%
L1 Cache	160 KB	384 KB+140%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon HD 6290
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6290 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6290 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6290. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6290) — the Radeon HD 6290 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon HD 6290
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6290). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon HD 6290
DirectX	10.0	11.2+12%
OpenGL	3.3	4.4+33%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: UVD 1.0 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6290).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon HD 6290
Encoder	Avivo HD	—
Decoder	UVD 1.0	UVD 3
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 6290's 375W — a 170.4% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6290). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 65°C.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon HD 6290
TDP	30W-92%	375W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85	65°C-24%
Perf/Watt	3.4+1033%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT came in at $49, while the Radeon HD 6290 launched at $50. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT was 2% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 2.1 (Radeon HD 6290) — the Radeon HD 6290 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 6290 (2011 vs 2009).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon HD 6290
MSRP	$49-2%	$50
Performance per Dollar	2.1	2.1
Codename	M98	Antilles
Release	January 9 2009	March 8 2011
Ranking	#818	#583

Search Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6290 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.