G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Radeon X1950 GT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Radeon X1950 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
✅Delivers 174.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 335W, a 305W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2009 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon X1950 GT

2022

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1950 GT is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
185.7% HIGHER MSRP
$140 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌1016.7% higher power demand at 335W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon X1950 GT is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.9% in PassMark G3D (106 vs 102), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon X1950 GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 7nm process instead of 55nm, 80 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2009. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT makes the most sense to buy today. It is $91 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $140, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 174.9% (2.1 vs 0.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon X1950 GT has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Radeon X1950 GT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.

Radeon X1950 GT

The Radeon X1950 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points. Launch price was $1,099.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT scores 102 and the Radeon X1950 GT reaches 106 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is built on TeraScale while the Radeon X1950 GT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1950 GT). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1950 GT).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon X1950 GT
G3D Mark Score	102	106+4%
Architecture	TeraScale	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	800 ×2	5120+540%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.88 TFLOPS ×2	23.8 TFLOPS+2605%
ROPs	16 ×2	128+700%
TMUs	40 ×2	320+700%
L1 Cache	0.16 MB	1 MB+525%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + RSR

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon X1950 GT
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1950 GT carries 512 MB. Radeon X1950 GT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT and 64-bit on the Radeon X1950 GT. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1950 GT) — the Radeon X1950 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon X1950 GT
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1950 GT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon X1950 GT
DirectX	10.0+11%	9_0c
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs Avivo (Radeon X1950 GT). Decoder: UVD 1.0 vs Avivo.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon X1950 GT
Encoder	Avivo HD	Avivo
Decoder	UVD 1.0	Avivo
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT draws 30W versus the Radeon X1950 GT's 335W — a 167.1% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 350W (Radeon X1950 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon X1950 GT
TDP	30W-91%	335W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	230mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	3.4+1033%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT came in at $49, while the Radeon X1950 GT launched at $140. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT was 65% cheaper ($91 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 0.8 (Radeon X1950 GT) — the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT offers 162.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1950 GT (2022 vs 2009).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon X1950 GT
MSRP	$49-65%	$140
Performance per Dollar	2.1+163%	0.8
Codename	M98	Navi 21
Release	January 9 2009	May 10 2022
Ranking	#818	#25

Search Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT on Amazon

Search Radeon X1950 GT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.