G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Radeon X1600 Pro FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Radeon X1600 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 213.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2009 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon X1600 Pro

2020

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 Pro is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
204.1% HIGHER MSRP
$149 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3% in PassMark G3D (102 vs 99), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon X1600 Pro is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 7nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2009. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 213.3% (2.1 vs 0.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon X1600 Pro has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Radeon X1600 Pro Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.

Radeon X1600 Pro

The Radeon X1600 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT scores 102 and the Radeon X1600 Pro reaches 99 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is built on TeraScale while the Radeon X1600 Pro uses RDNA 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 2,048 (Radeon X1600 Pro). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600 Pro).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon X1600 Pro
G3D Mark Score	102+3%	99
Architecture	TeraScale	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	800 ×2	2048+156%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.88 TFLOPS ×2	6.39 TFLOPS+626%
ROPs	16 ×2	64+300%
TMUs	40 ×2	128+220%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	3 MB+1100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + RSR

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon X1600 Pro
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1600 Pro carries 512 MB. Radeon X1600 Pro gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600 Pro. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 3 MB (Radeon X1600 Pro) — the Radeon X1600 Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon X1600 Pro
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	3 MB+1100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 9.0c (Radeon X1600 Pro). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon X1600 Pro
DirectX	10.0+11%	9.0c
OpenGL	3.3+57%	2.1
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs None (Radeon X1600 Pro). Decoder: UVD 1.0 vs Avivo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon X1600 Pro).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon X1600 Pro
Encoder	Avivo HD	None
Decoder	UVD 1.0	Avivo
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT draws 30W versus the Radeon X1600 Pro's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 350W (Radeon X1600 Pro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon X1600 Pro
TDP	30W-80%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	85	75-12%
Perf/Watt	3.4+386%	0.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT came in at $49, while the Radeon X1600 Pro launched at $149. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT was 67.1% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 0.7 (Radeon X1600 Pro) — the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT offers 200% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1600 Pro (2020 vs 2009).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon X1600 Pro
MSRP	$49-67%	$149
Performance per Dollar	2.1+200%	0.7
Codename	M98	Navi 10
Release	January 9 2009	January 21 2020
Ranking	#818	#216

Search Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT on Amazon

Search Radeon X1600 Pro on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.