Quadro FX 3400/4400 vs Quadro FX 570M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is positioned at rank 421 and the Quadro FX 570M is on rank 404, so the Quadro FX 570M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3400/4400

#405

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

246217%

#420

Quadro FX 1300

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

100%

#421

Quadro FX 3400/4400

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50

100%

#422

Quadro FX 4000

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50

83%

#423

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

67%

#424

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

33%

#425

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

17%

#426

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 570M

#389

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

73865%

#404

Quadro FX 570M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#405

GRID K340

MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57

100%

#406

Quadro FX 4600

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50

100%

#407

Quadro FX 5600

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50

90%

#408

Quadro FX 3500

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

85%

#410

Quadro FX 1400

MSRP: $799|Avg: $30

80%

#411

GRID K1

MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120

80%

#413

GRID P4-1Q

MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185

60%

#416

GRID RTX6000-2Q

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500

50%

#417

GRID M60-0B

MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900

45%

#418

Quadro FX 4500 X2

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

40%

#419

Quadro FX 5500

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30

40%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 570M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro FX 3400/4400	Quadro FX 570M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+5.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 3400/4400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 3400/4400 Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 570M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3400/4400 and Quadro FX 570M

Quadro FX 3400/4400

The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Quadro FX 570M

The Quadro FX 570M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3400/4400 scores 104 versus the Quadro FX 570M's 99 — the Quadro FX 3400/4400 leads by 5.1%. The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 570M uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 3400/4400) vs 240 (Quadro FX 570M). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3400/4400) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 570M).

Feature	Quadro FX 3400/4400	Quadro FX 570M
G3D Mark Score	104+5%	99
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	192	240+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	0.6221 TFLOPS+35%
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	64	80+25%
L2 Cache	192 KB	256 KB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3400/4400	Quadro FX 570M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3400/4400 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 570M has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 570M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 3400/4400) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 570M) — the Quadro FX 570M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 3400/4400	Quadro FX 570M
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	192 KB	256 KB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3400/4400 draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 570M's 189W — a 23% difference. The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3400/4400) vs 350W (Quadro FX 570M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.