CPU
GPU
Quadro FX 3450
Popular choices:
GeForce 9600M GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3450 is positioned at rank 337 and the GeForce 9600M GT is on rank 640, so the Quadro FX 3450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3450
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9600M GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9600M GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 9.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 3450.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3450 | GeForce 9600M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-9.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+9.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9600M GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9600M GT holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $30), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 64.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3450 | GeForce 9600M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+64.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3450 and GeForce 9600M GT
Quadro FX 3450
The Quadro FX 3450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 149 points. Launch price was $3,499.
GeForce 9600M GT
The GeForce 9600M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3450 scores 149 versus the GeForce 9600M GT's 163 — the GeForce 9600M GT leads by 9.4%. The Quadro FX 3450 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 9600M GT uses G9x, both on 55 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3450) vs 224 (GeForce 9600M GT).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3450 | GeForce 9600M GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 149 | 163+9% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 240+7% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3450 | GeForce 9600M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 3450 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9600M GT has 512 MB. The GeForce 9600M GT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3450 | GeForce 9600M GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3450 draws 189W versus the GeForce 9600M GT's 150W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 9600M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3450) vs 350W (GeForce 9600M GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3450 | GeForce 9600M GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 150W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8 | 1.1+38% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 3450 launched at $119 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce 9600M GT launched at $80 and now averages $20. The GeForce 9600M GT costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.0 (Quadro FX 3450) vs 8.2 (GeForce 9600M GT) — the GeForce 9600M GT offers 64% better value.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3450 | GeForce 9600M GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $119 | $80-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $20-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.0 | 8.2+64% |
| Codename | GT200B | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | November 11 2008 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #815 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 3450 and GeForce 9600M GT
