
Quadro FX 3450 vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP

Quadro FX 3450
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 3650 AGP
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3450 is positioned at rank 337 and the Radeon HD 3650 AGP is on rank 650, so the Quadro FX 3450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3450
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3650 AGP
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 3450.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3450 | Radeon HD 3650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 3650 AGP offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 3650 AGP holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $30), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 51% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3450 | Radeon HD 3650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+51%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3450 and Radeon HD 3650 AGP

Quadro FX 3450
The Quadro FX 3450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 149 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 3650 AGP
The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 150 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 3450 scores 149 and the Radeon HD 3650 AGP reaches 150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3450 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 3650 AGP uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3450) vs 480 (Radeon HD 3650 AGP). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3450) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3650 AGP).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3450 | Radeon HD 3650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 149 | 150 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 480+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS+8% | 0.576 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3450 | Radeon HD 3650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 3450 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3650 AGP has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 3650 AGP offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3450 | Radeon HD 3650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3450 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 3650 AGP's 45W — a 123.1% difference. The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3450) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3650 AGP). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3450 | Radeon HD 3650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 45W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8 | 3.3+313% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 3450 launched at $119 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon HD 3650 AGP launched at $80 and now averages $20. The Radeon HD 3650 AGP costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.0 (Quadro FX 3450) vs 7.5 (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) — the Radeon HD 3650 AGP offers 50% better value. The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3450 | Radeon HD 3650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $119 | $80-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $20-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.0 | 7.5+50% |
| Codename | GT200B | Onega |
| Release | November 11 2008 | April 19 2011 |
| Ranking | #815 | #926 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















