CPU
GPU
GeForce 9600M GT
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 3450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9600M GT is positioned at rank 640 and the Quadro FX 3450 is on rank 337, so the Quadro FX 3450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9600M GT
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3450
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9600M GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 9.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 3450.
| Insight | GeForce 9600M GT | Quadro FX 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+9.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-9.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9600M GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9600M GT holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $30), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 64.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9600M GT | Quadro FX 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+64.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9600M GT and Quadro FX 3450
GeForce 9600M GT
The GeForce 9600M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points.
Quadro FX 3450
The Quadro FX 3450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 149 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9600M GT scores 163 versus the Quadro FX 3450's 149 — the GeForce 9600M GT leads by 9.4%. The GeForce 9600M GT is built on G9x while the Quadro FX 3450 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9600M GT) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3450).
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Quadro FX 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 163+9% | 149 |
| Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 240+7% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Quadro FX 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9600M GT comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3450 has 256 MB. The GeForce 9600M GT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Quadro FX 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9600M GT draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 3450's 189W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 9600M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9600M GT) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3450). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Quadro FX 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-21% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.1+38% | 0.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9600M GT launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Quadro FX 3450 launched at $119 and now averages $30. The GeForce 9600M GT costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.2 (GeForce 9600M GT) vs 5.0 (Quadro FX 3450) — the GeForce 9600M GT offers 64% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Quadro FX 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-33% | $119 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-33% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2+64% | 5.0 |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GT200B |
| Release | July 15 2008 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #825 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9600M GT and Quadro FX 3450
