CPU
GPU
GeForce 9600M GT
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 7350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9600M GT is positioned at rank 640 and the Radeon HD 7350 is on rank 254, so the Radeon HD 7350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9600M GT
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7350
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9600M GT.
| Insight | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 7350 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7350 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7350 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $20), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 102.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 7350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+102.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9600M GT and Radeon HD 7350
GeForce 9600M GT
The GeForce 9600M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points.
Radeon HD 7350
The Radeon HD 7350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 165 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9600M GT scores 163 and the Radeon HD 7350 reaches 165 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9600M GT is built on G9x while the Radeon HD 7350 uses GCN 1.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9600M GT) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7350).
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 7350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 163 | 165+1% |
| Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 1792+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 7350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 7350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9600M GT draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 7350's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce 9600M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9600M GT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7350). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 7350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.1+38% | 0.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9600M GT launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon HD 7350 launched at $40 and now averages $10. The Radeon HD 7350 costs 50% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.2 (GeForce 9600M GT) vs 16.5 (Radeon HD 7350) — the Radeon HD 7350 offers 101.2% better value. The Radeon HD 7350 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 7350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80 | $40-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $10-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2 | 16.5+101% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | Tahiti |
| Release | July 15 2008 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #825 | #454 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9600M GT and Radeon HD 7350
