
GeForce 9600M GT

Radeon HD 4350
GeForce 9600M GT vs Radeon HD 4350 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9600M GT vs Radeon HD 4350 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9600M GT vs Radeon HD 4350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9600M GT
2008Why buy it
- ✅9.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌128.6% HIGHER MSRP$80 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 4.7 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 110W.
Radeon HD 4350
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $45 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 131.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.7 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 150W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9600M GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9600M GT vs Radeon HD 4350 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9600M GT
The GeForce 9600M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points.

Radeon HD 4350
The Radeon HD 4350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 165 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9600M GT scores 163 and the Radeon HD 4350 reaches 165 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9600M GT is built on G9x while the Radeon HD 4350 uses TeraScale, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9600M GT) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4350).
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 4350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 163 | 165+1% |
| Architecture | G9x | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 800+257% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9600M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4350 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9600M GT has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4350 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 4350 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9600M GT and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4350.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 4350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9600M GT) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4350). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 4350 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9600M GT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 4350).
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9600M GT draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 4350's 110W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon HD 4350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9600M GT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4350). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 4350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 110W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 72°C-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.1 | 1.5+36% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9600M GT came in at $80, while the Radeon HD 4350 launched at $35. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4350 was 56.3% cheaper ($45 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (GeForce 9600M GT) vs 4.7 (Radeon HD 4350) — the Radeon HD 4350 offers 135% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 4350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80 | $35-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 4.7+135% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | RV770 |
| Release | July 15 2008 | June 25 2008 |
| Ranking | #825 | #876 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














