GeForce 9200 vs GeForce 9600M GT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9200 vs GeForce 9600M GT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9200 vs GeForce 9600M GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9200

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Delivers 64.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.4 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Draws 16W instead of 150W, a 134W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9600M GT across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce 9600M GT

2008

Why buy it

✅290.0% more average FPS across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
60% HIGHER MSRP
$80 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 3.4 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌837.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 9600M GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 290.0% in average FPS across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 9200 instead at 168 vs 163, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 9200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 65nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 9200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $80, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 64.9% (3.4 vs 2.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce 9600M GT still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 9200 vs GeForce 9600M GT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9200

The GeForce 9200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 168 points.

GeForce 9600M GT

The GeForce 9600M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9200 scores 168 and the GeForce 9600M GT reaches 163 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 9600M GT uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200) vs 224 (GeForce 9600M GT).

Feature	GeForce 9200	GeForce 9600M GT
G3D Mark Score	168+3%	163
Architecture	Maxwell	G9x
Process Node	28 nm	65 nm
Shading Units	256+14%	224

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 9200	GeForce 9600M GT
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9200 and 64-bit on the GeForce 9600M GT.

Feature	GeForce 9200	GeForce 9600M GT
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9200) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9600M GT). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce 9200	GeForce 9600M GT
DirectX	10.0	10.0
Vulkan	N/A	None
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9200) vs No (GeForce 9600M GT). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 9200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9600M GT).

Feature	GeForce 9200	GeForce 9600M GT
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP2)	PureVideo HD VP3
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9200 draws 16W versus the GeForce 9600M GT's 150W — a 161.4% difference. The GeForce 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200) vs 350W (GeForce 9600M GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce 9200	GeForce 9600M GT
TDP	16W-89%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	70-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	10.5+855%	1.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9200 came in at $50, while the GeForce 9600M GT launched at $80. On MSRP, GeForce 9200 was 37.5% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.4 (GeForce 9200) vs 2.0 (GeForce 9600M GT) — the GeForce 9200 offers 70% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9200 (2016 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 9200	GeForce 9600M GT
MSRP	$50-38%	$80
Performance per Dollar	3.4+70%	2.0
Codename	GM108	NB9E-GTX
Release	March 25 2016	July 15 2008
Ranking	#864	#825

Search GeForce 9200 on Amazon

Search GeForce 9600M GT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.