GeForce 9200 vs Quadro FX 1700M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9200 vs Quadro FX 1700M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9200 vs Quadro FX 1700M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9200

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 16W instead of 189W, a 173W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 1700M across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 1700M

2008

Why buy it

✅295.0% more average FPS across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌1081.3% higher power demand at 189W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 1700M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 295.0% in average FPS across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3% in PassMark G3D (173 vs 168), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 9200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 9200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro FX 1700M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 9200 vs Quadro FX 1700M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9200

The GeForce 9200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 168 points.

Quadro FX 1700M

The Quadro FX 1700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 173 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9200 scores 168 and the Quadro FX 1700M reaches 173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200 is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 1700M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1700M). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700M).

Feature	GeForce 9200	Quadro FX 1700M
G3D Mark Score	168	173+3%
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	256+7%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5084 TFLOPS	0.6221 TFLOPS+22%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 1700M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9200	Quadro FX 1700M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9200 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1700M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9200) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 1700M) — the GeForce 9200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 9200	Quadro FX 1700M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9200) vs 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro FX 1700M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 9200	Quadro FX 1700M
DirectX	10.0	11.1 (10_0)+11%
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 9200) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro FX 1700M).

Feature	GeForce 9200	Quadro FX 1700M
Encoder	None	—
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP2)	PureVideo HD
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9200 draws 16W versus the Quadro FX 1700M's 189W — a 168.8% difference. The GeForce 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1700M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce 9200	Quadro FX 1700M
TDP	16W-92%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	70-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	10.5+1067%	0.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 9200 (2016 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 9200	Quadro FX 1700M
MSRP	$50	—
Codename	GM108	GT200B
Release	March 25 2016	November 11 2008
Ranking	#864	#815

Search GeForce 9200 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 1700M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.