GeForce 9200 vs Radeon HD 4350

CPU

GPU

GeForce 9200

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Radeon HD 4350

2008Core: 625 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce 9200 vs Radeon HD 4350 Performance Spectrum

GeForce 9200

0.5 GB 16

168

+1.8%

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

Radeon HD 4350

1 GB 110

165

0.0%

Mobility Radeon X1600

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9200 vs Radeon HD 4350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9200 vs Radeon HD 4350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9200

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 16W instead of 110W, a 94W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4350 across 18 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
42.9% HIGHER MSRP
$50 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.4 vs 4.7 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Radeon HD 4350

2008

Why buy it

✅238.9% more average FPS across 18 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $15 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Delivers 40.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.7 vs 3.4 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌587.5% higher power demand at 110W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 4350 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 238.9% in average FPS across 18 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 9200 instead at 168 vs 165, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 9200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 4350 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $15 cheaper on MSRP at $35 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 40.3% (4.7 vs 3.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4350 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 9200 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9200 vs Radeon HD 4350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9200

The GeForce 9200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 168 points.

Radeon HD 4350

The Radeon HD 4350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 165 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9200 scores 168 and the Radeon HD 4350 reaches 165 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 4350 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4350). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4350).

Feature	GeForce 9200	Radeon HD 4350
G3D Mark Score	168+2%	165
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	256	800+213%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5084 TFLOPS	1 TFLOPS+97%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	128 KB	160 KB+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4350 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9200	Radeon HD 4350
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4350 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 4350 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9200 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4350. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9200) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4350) — the GeForce 9200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 9200	Radeon HD 4350
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9200) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4350). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce 9200	Radeon HD 4350
DirectX	10.0	10.1
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 9200) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 4350).

Feature	GeForce 9200	Radeon HD 4350
Encoder	None	—
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP2)	UVD 2.2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9200 draws 16W versus the Radeon HD 4350's 110W — a 149.2% difference. The GeForce 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4350). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 72°C.

Feature	GeForce 9200	Radeon HD 4350
TDP	16W-85%	110W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	70-3%	72°C
Perf/Watt	10.5+600%	1.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9200 came in at $50, while the Radeon HD 4350 launched at $35. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4350 was 30% cheaper ($15 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.4 (GeForce 9200) vs 4.7 (Radeon HD 4350) — the Radeon HD 4350 offers 38.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9200 (2016 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 9200	Radeon HD 4350
MSRP	$50	$35-30%
Performance per Dollar	3.4	4.7+38%
Codename	GM108	RV770
Release	March 25 2016	June 25 2008
Ranking	#864	#876

Search GeForce 9200 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.