GeForce 9200 vs GeForce GT 325M
GeForce 9200
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 325M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9200 is positioned at rank 562 and the GeForce GT 325M is on rank 274, so the GeForce GT 325M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 325M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 325M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9200.
| Insight | GeForce 9200 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 31.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9200 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+31.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9200 and GeForce GT 325M
GeForce 9200
The GeForce 9200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 168 points.
GeForce GT 325M
The GeForce GT 325M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9200 scores 168 and the GeForce GT 325M reaches 170 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 325M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200) vs 384 (GeForce GT 325M). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200) vs 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 325M).
| Feature | GeForce 9200 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 168 | 170+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5084 TFLOPS | 0.7526 TFLOPS+48% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+300% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9200 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9200 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 325M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 325M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9200) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 325M) — the GeForce 9200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9200 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9200) vs 11 (10_1) (GeForce GT 325M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9200 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11 (10_1)+10% |
| OpenGL | 3.3+3% | 3.2 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9200) vs CUDA (GeForce GT 325M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 9200) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 325M).
| Feature | GeForce 9200 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | CUDA |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP2) | PureVideo VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9200 draws 16W versus the GeForce GT 325M's 50W — a 103% difference. The GeForce 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200) vs 350W (GeForce GT 325M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 9200 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 16W-68% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 10.5+209% | 3.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9200 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.2 (GeForce 9200) vs 8.5 (GeForce GT 325M) — the GeForce 9200 offers 31.8% better value. The GeForce 9200 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 9200 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-25% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.2+32% | 8.5 |
| Codename | GM108 | GK107 |
| Release | March 25 2016 | June 25 2013 |
| Ranking | #864 | #726 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9200 and GeForce GT 325M
