GeForce 9600M GT vs Radeon HD 3670
GeForce 9600M GT
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 3670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9600M GT is positioned at rank 640 and the Radeon HD 3670 is on rank 320, so the Radeon HD 3670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9600M GT
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3670
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 3670 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9600M GT.
| Insight | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 3670 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 3670 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 38.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+38.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9600M GT and Radeon HD 3670
GeForce 9600M GT
The GeForce 9600M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points.
Radeon HD 3670
The Radeon HD 3670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 169 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9600M GT scores 163 and the Radeon HD 3670 reaches 169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9600M GT is built on G9x while the Radeon HD 3670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9600M GT) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 3670).
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 163 | 169+4% |
| Architecture | G9x | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 1536+586% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9600M GT) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 3670). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9600M GT) vs UVD (Radeon HD 3670). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9600M GT draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 3670's 250W — a 50% difference. The GeForce 9600M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9600M GT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3670). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.1+57% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9600M GT launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon HD 3670 launched at $100 and now averages $15. The Radeon HD 3670 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.2 (GeForce 9600M GT) vs 11.3 (Radeon HD 3670) — the Radeon HD 3670 offers 37.8% better value. The Radeon HD 3670 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GT | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-20% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $15-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2 | 11.3+38% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | Cayman |
| Release | July 15 2008 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #825 | #596 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9600M GT and Radeon HD 3670
