Quadro 400 vs Quadro FX 3450

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 400 vs Quadro FX 3450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 400 vs Quadro FX 3450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 400

2017

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 189W, a 159W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3450 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
42% HIGHER MSRP
$169 MSRPvs$119 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).

Quadro FX 3450

2008

Why buy it

✅4.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($119 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌530% higher power demand at 189W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 3450 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (149 vs 148), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 3450 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $119 vs $169, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 43% (1.3 vs 0.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 3450 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 400 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 400 vs Quadro FX 3450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 400

The Quadro 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $119.99.

Quadro FX 3450

The Quadro FX 3450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 149 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 400 scores 148 and the Quadro FX 3450 reaches 149 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 400 is built on Pascal while the Quadro FX 3450 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 400) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3450). Raw compute: 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro 400) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3450).

Feature	Quadro 400	Quadro FX 3450
G3D Mark Score	148	149
Architecture	Pascal	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	256+7%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.641 TFLOPS+3%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	16	80+400%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 400	Quadro FX 3450
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 400 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3450 carries 256 MB. Quadro 400 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 400 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3450. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 400) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 3450) — the Quadro 400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 400	Quadro FX 3450
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 400 draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 3450's 189W — a 145.2% difference. The Quadro 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 400) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro 400	Quadro FX 3450
TDP	30W-84%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	4.9+513%	0.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 400 came in at $169, while the Quadro FX 3450 launched at $119. On MSRP, Quadro FX 3450 was 29.6% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (Quadro 400) vs 1.3 (Quadro FX 3450) — the Quadro FX 3450 offers 44.4% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 400 (2017 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro 400	Quadro FX 3450
MSRP	$169	$119-30%
Performance per Dollar	0.9	1.3+44%
Codename	GP107	GT200B
Release	February 7 2017	November 11 2008
Ranking	#741	#815

Search Quadro 400 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 3450 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.