Quadro 400 vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 400 vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 400 vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 400

2017

Why buy it

✅5.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 30W instead of 45W, a 15W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
111.3% HIGHER MSRP
$169 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $89 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Delivers 114.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 45W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 400 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 3650 AGP instead at 150 vs 148, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 3650 AGP makes the most sense to buy today. It is $89 cheaper on MSRP at $80 vs $169, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 114.1% (1.9 vs 0.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 3650 AGP is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 400 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 400 vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 400

The Quadro 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $119.99.

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 150 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 400 scores 148 and the Radeon HD 3650 AGP reaches 150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 400 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 3650 AGP uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 400) vs 480 (Radeon HD 3650 AGP). Raw compute: 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro 400) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3650 AGP).

Feature	Quadro 400	Radeon HD 3650 AGP
G3D Mark Score	148	150+1%
Architecture	Pascal	TeraScale 2
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	256	480+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.641 TFLOPS+11%	0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	16	24+50%
L1 Cache	96 KB+100%	48 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 400	Radeon HD 3650 AGP
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 400 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3650 AGP. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 400) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) — the Quadro 400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 400	Radeon HD 3650 AGP
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 400 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 3650 AGP's 45W — a 40% difference. The Quadro 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 400) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3650 AGP). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro 400	Radeon HD 3650 AGP
TDP	30W-33%	45W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	168mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	4.9+48%	3.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 400 came in at $169, while the Radeon HD 3650 AGP launched at $80. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3650 AGP was 52.7% cheaper ($89 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (Quadro 400) vs 1.9 (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) — the Radeon HD 3650 AGP offers 111.1% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 400 (2017 vs 2011).

Feature	Quadro 400	Radeon HD 3650 AGP
MSRP	$169	$80-53%
Performance per Dollar	0.9	1.9+111%
Codename	GP107	Onega
Release	February 7 2017	April 19 2011
Ranking	#741	#926

Search Quadro 400 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 3650 AGP on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.