Quadro 400 vs Radeon HD 8350

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 400 vs Radeon HD 8350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 400 vs Radeon HD 8350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 400

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $31 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 130W, a 100W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8350 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 8350

2012

Why buy it

✅37.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
18.3% HIGHER MSRP
$200 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌333.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8350 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 37.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 10.1% in PassMark G3D (163 vs 148), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro 400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $31 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 7.5% (0.9 vs 0.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 8350 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro 400 vs Radeon HD 8350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 400

The Quadro 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $119.99.

Radeon HD 8350

The Radeon HD 8350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro 400 scores 148 versus the Radeon HD 8350's 163 — the Radeon HD 8350 leads by 10.1%. The Quadro 400 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 8350 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 400) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8350). Raw compute: 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro 400) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8350). Boost clocks: 1252 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	Quadro 400	Radeon HD 8350
G3D Mark Score	148	163+10%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	1024+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.641 TFLOPS	1.761 TFLOPS+175%
Boost Clock	1252 MHz+25%	1000 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	16	64+300%
L1 Cache	96 KB	256 KB+167%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 400	Radeon HD 8350
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 400 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8350.

Feature	Quadro 400	Radeon HD 8350
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 400 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 8350's 130W — a 125% difference. The Quadro 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 400) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro 400	Radeon HD 8350
TDP	30W-77%	130W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	168mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	4.9+277%	1.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 400 came in at $169, while the Radeon HD 8350 launched at $200. On MSRP, Quadro 400 was 15.5% cheaper ($31 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (Quadro 400) vs 0.8 (Radeon HD 8350) — the Quadro 400 offers 12.5% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 400 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro 400	Radeon HD 8350
MSRP	$169-16%	$200
Performance per Dollar	0.9+12%	0.8
Codename	GP107	Pitcairn
Release	February 7 2017	March 5 2012
Ranking	#741	#503

Search Quadro 400 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.