CPU
GPU
Quadro 400
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 220
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 400 is positioned at rank 360 and the Radeon R5 220 is on rank 252, so the Radeon R5 220 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 400
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 220
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R5 220 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro 400 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 220 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 220 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $500), it costs 97% less, resulting in a 3210.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 400 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3210.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 400 and Radeon R5 220
Quadro 400
The Quadro 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $119.99.
Radeon R5 220
The Radeon R5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 400 scores 148 and the Radeon R5 220 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 400 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R5 220 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 400) vs 2,560 (Radeon R5 220). Raw compute: 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro 400) vs 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 220).
| Feature | Quadro 400 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 148 | 147 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 2560+900% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.641 TFLOPS | 4.849 TFLOPS+656% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 160+900% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 640 KB+567% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 400 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 400 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 220 has 1 GB. The Radeon R5 220 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro 400) vs 1 MB (Radeon R5 220) — the Radeon R5 220 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 400 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_1 (Quadro 400) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 220). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro 400 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_1 | 11.2+12% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 400 draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 220's 275W — a 160.7% difference. The Quadro 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 400) vs 350W (Radeon R5 220). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Quadro 400 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-89% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9+880% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 400 launched at $169 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon R5 220 launched at $35 and now averages $15. The Radeon R5 220 costs 97% less ($485 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (Quadro 400) vs 9.8 (Radeon R5 220) — the Radeon R5 220 offers 3166.7% better value. The Quadro 400 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro 400 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $35-79% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $15-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | 9.8+3167% |
| Codename | GP107 | Hawaii |
| Release | February 7 2017 | November 5 2013 |
| Ranking | #741 | #316 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 400 and Radeon R5 220
