Quadro 400 vs Radeon R5 220

NVIDIA

Quadro 400

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1252 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 220

2013Core: 947 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro 400 vs Radeon R5 220 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 400 vs Radeon R5 220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 400

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 30W instead of 275W, a 245W reduction.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 220 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 382.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $169 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Radeon R5 220

2013

Why buy it

  • 4.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $134 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • Delivers 379.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 816.7% higher power demand at 275W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R5 220 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro 400 instead at 148 vs 147, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro 400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 220 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $134 cheaper on MSRP at $35 vs $169, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 379.6% (4.2 vs 0.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 220 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 400 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 400 vs Radeon R5 220 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro 400

The Quadro 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $119.99.

AMD

Radeon R5 220

The Radeon R5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 400 scores 148 and the Radeon R5 220 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 400 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R5 220 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 400) vs 2,560 (Radeon R5 220). Raw compute: 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro 400) vs 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 220).

FeatureQuadro 400Radeon R5 220
G3D Mark Score
148
147
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
2560+900%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.641 TFLOPS
4.849 TFLOPS+656%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
16
160+900%
L1 Cache
96 KB
640 KB+567%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro 400Radeon R5 220
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 400 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 220 carries 1 GB. Radeon R5 220 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 400 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 220. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro 400) vs 1 MB (Radeon R5 220) — the Radeon R5 220 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro 400Radeon R5 220
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10_1 (Quadro 400) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 220). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureQuadro 400Radeon R5 220
DirectX
10_1
11.2+12%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 400 draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 220's 275W — a 160.7% difference. The Quadro 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 400) vs 350W (Radeon R5 220). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureQuadro 400Radeon R5 220
TDP
30W-89%
275W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
168mm
Slots
1
1
Perf/Watt
4.9+880%
0.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 400 came in at $169, while the Radeon R5 220 launched at $35. On MSRP, Radeon R5 220 was 79.3% cheaper ($134 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (Quadro 400) vs 4.2 (Radeon R5 220) — the Radeon R5 220 offers 366.7% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 400 (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro 400Radeon R5 220
MSRP
$169
$35-79%
Performance per Dollar
0.9
4.2+367%
Codename
GP107
Hawaii
Release
February 7 2017
November 5 2013
Ranking
#741
#316

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.