
Quadro 400

Radeon R5 220
Quadro 400 vs Radeon R5 220 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro 400 vs Radeon R5 220 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro 400 vs Radeon R5 220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro 400
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 275W, a 245W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 220 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌382.9% HIGHER MSRP$169 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
Radeon R5 220
2013Why buy it
- ✅4.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $134 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 379.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌816.7% higher power demand at 275W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 400 vs Radeon R5 220 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 400
The Quadro 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $119.99.

Radeon R5 220
The Radeon R5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 400 scores 148 and the Radeon R5 220 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 400 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R5 220 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 400) vs 2,560 (Radeon R5 220). Raw compute: 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro 400) vs 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 220).
| Feature | Quadro 400 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 148 | 147 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 2560+900% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.641 TFLOPS | 4.849 TFLOPS+656% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 160+900% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 640 KB+567% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 400 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 400 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 220 carries 1 GB. Radeon R5 220 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 400 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 220. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro 400) vs 1 MB (Radeon R5 220) — the Radeon R5 220 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 400 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_1 (Quadro 400) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 220). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro 400 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_1 | 11.2+12% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 400 draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 220's 275W — a 160.7% difference. The Quadro 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 400) vs 350W (Radeon R5 220). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Quadro 400 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-89% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9+880% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro 400 came in at $169, while the Radeon R5 220 launched at $35. On MSRP, Radeon R5 220 was 79.3% cheaper ($134 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (Quadro 400) vs 4.2 (Radeon R5 220) — the Radeon R5 220 offers 366.7% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 400 (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro 400 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $35-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 4.2+367% |
| Codename | GP107 | Hawaii |
| Release | February 7 2017 | November 5 2013 |
| Ranking | #741 | #316 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














