Quadro 400 vs GeForce 9600M GT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 400 is positioned at rank 360 and the GeForce 9600M GT is on rank 640, so the Quadro 400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 400

#344

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

16788%

#359

FirePro 2260

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

100%

#360

Quadro 400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $500

100%

#361

Quadro FX 380 LP

MSRP: $169|Avg: $15

98%

#363

Quadro FX 1800

MSRP: $489|Avg: $100

92%

#364

FirePro 3D V8700

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229

91%

#365

FirePro 3D V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80

91%

#366

Quadro 5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100

90%

#367

FirePro V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $20

89%

#368

FirePro V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250

89%

#369

FirePro 3D V8750

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500

81%

#370

FirePro 3D V7750

MSRP: $799|Avg: $20

77%

#371

GRID M10-2B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80

75%

#372

Quadro FX 370

MSRP: $129|Avg: $500

74%

#373

GRID M6-0B

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

69%

#374

Quadro 6000

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150

69%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9600M GT

#629

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

5322%

#631

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

4825%

#632

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

4812%

#636

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

4375%

#637

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

4346%

#639

GeForce 8300

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

100%

#640

GeForce 9600M GT

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

100%

#641

Mobility Radeon HD 3430

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

98%

#642

Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

97%

#643

GeForce 9500 GS

MSRP: $110|Avg: $10

96%

#644

GeForce 9300GE

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

96%

#645

Mobility Radeon HD 3470 Hybrid X2

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

94%

#646

Mobility Radeon HD 4270

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

93%

#647

GeForce 9500 GT

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

93%

#648

GeForce 8500 GT

MSRP: $89|Avg: $15

93%

#649

Mobility Radeon X1600

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

92%

#650

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

92%

#651

GeForce 9400M G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

92%

#652

GeForce 9600M GS

MSRP: $70|Avg: $20

92%

#653

Mobility Radeon HD 3470

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

91%

#654

Mobility Radeon HD 4200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $45

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro 400 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2008). The Quadro 400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9600M GT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 9600M GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 400.

Insight	Quadro 400	GeForce 9600M GT
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-10.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+10.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 9600M GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9600M GT holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $500), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 2653.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro 400	GeForce 9600M GT
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+2653.4%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)	✅More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro 400 Benchmark Check

GeForce 9600M GT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 400 and GeForce 9600M GT

Quadro 400

The Quadro 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $119.99.

GeForce 9600M GT

The GeForce 9600M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro 400 scores 148 versus the GeForce 9600M GT's 163 — the GeForce 9600M GT leads by 10.1%. The Quadro 400 is built on Pascal while the GeForce 9600M GT uses G9x, both on 14 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 400) vs 224 (GeForce 9600M GT).

Feature	Quadro 400	GeForce 9600M GT
G3D Mark Score	148	163+10%
Architecture	Pascal	G9x
Process Node	14 nm	65 nm
Shading Units	256+14%	224

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 400	GeForce 9600M GT
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Quadro 400	GeForce 9600M GT
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10_1 (Quadro 400) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9600M GT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	Quadro 400	GeForce 9600M GT
DirectX	10_1	10.0
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 400 draws 30W versus the GeForce 9600M GT's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 400) vs 350W (GeForce 9600M GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Quadro 400	GeForce 9600M GT
TDP	30W-80%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	168mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	4.9+345%	1.1

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro 400 launched at $169 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce 9600M GT launched at $80 and now averages $20. The GeForce 9600M GT costs 96% less ($480 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (Quadro 400) vs 8.2 (GeForce 9600M GT) — the GeForce 9600M GT offers 2633.3% better value. The Quadro 400 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2008).