Quadro FX 350 vs nForce 750a SLI
Quadro FX 350
Popular choices:
nForce 750a SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro FX 350 is positioned at rank #385 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 350
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the nForce 750a SLI offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 350 | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 350 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 350 and nForce 750a SLI
Quadro FX 350
The Quadro FX 350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 86 points. Launch price was $3,499.
nForce 750a SLI
The nForce 750a SLI is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 83 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 350 scores 86 and the nForce 750a SLI reaches 83 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 350 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the nForce 750a SLI uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 350) vs 768 (nForce 750a SLI).
| Feature | Quadro FX 350 | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 86+4% | 83 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 768+220% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 350 | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 350 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the nForce 750a SLI has 512 MB. The nForce 750a SLI offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 350 | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 350 draws 189W versus the nForce 750a SLI's 30W — a 145.2% difference. The nForce 750a SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 350) vs 350W (nForce 750a SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 350 | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 30W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 2.8+460% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 350 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the nForce 750a SLI launched at $0 and now averages $0. The nForce 750a SLI costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.7 (Quadro FX 350) vs Infinity (nForce 750a SLI) — the nForce 750a SLI offers Infinity% better value. The nForce 750a SLI is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 350 | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | GT200B | N14P-GT |
| Release | November 11 2008 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #815 | #616 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 350 and nForce 750a SLI
