Quadro FX 350 vs Quadro FX 370

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 350 vs Quadro FX 370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 350 vs Quadro FX 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 350

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
54.3% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Quadro FX 370

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 50.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 350 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (86 vs 84), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 350 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $70 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 50.7% (0.7 vs 0.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 350 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 350 vs Quadro FX 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 350

The Quadro FX 350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 86 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Quadro FX 370

The Quadro FX 370 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 350 scores 86 and the Quadro FX 370 reaches 84 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 350 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 370 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 350) vs 240 (Quadro FX 370). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 370).

Feature	Quadro FX 350	Quadro FX 370
G3D Mark Score	86+2%	84
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	240	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 350	Quadro FX 370
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 350 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 370 carries 256 MB. Quadro FX 370 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 370.

Feature	Quadro FX 350	Quadro FX 370
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.25 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 350 draws 189W versus the Quadro FX 370's 189W — a 0% difference. The Quadro FX 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 350) vs 350W (Quadro FX 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX 350	Quadro FX 370
TDP	189W	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	0.5+25%	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 350 came in at $199, while the Quadro FX 370 launched at $129. On MSRP, Quadro FX 370 was 35.2% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (Quadro FX 350) vs 0.7 (Quadro FX 370) — the Quadro FX 370 offers 75% better value.

Feature	Quadro FX 350	Quadro FX 370
MSRP	$199	$129-35%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	0.7+75%
Codename	GT200B	GT200B
Release	November 11 2008	November 11 2008
Ranking	#815	#815

Search Quadro FX 350 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.