GeForce G205M vs Quadro FX 350

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G205M vs Quadro FX 350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G205M vs Quadro FX 350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G205M

2016

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 16W instead of 189W, a 173W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 350 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quadro FX 350

2008

Why buy it

✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌1081.3% higher power demand at 189W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 350 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce G205M instead at 92 vs 86, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce G205M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 350 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 350 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce G205M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce G205M vs Quadro FX 350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G205M

The GeForce G205M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.

Quadro FX 350

The Quadro FX 350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 86 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce G205M scores 92 versus the Quadro FX 350's 86 — the GeForce G205M leads by 7%. The GeForce G205M is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 350 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce G205M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce G205M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350).

Feature	GeForce G205M	Quadro FX 350
G3D Mark Score	92+7%	86
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	256+7%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5084 TFLOPS	0.6221 TFLOPS+22%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G205M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 350 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce G205M	Quadro FX 350
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce G205M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 350 carries 128 MB. GeForce G205M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G205M and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce G205M) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 350) — the GeForce G205M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce G205M	Quadro FX 350
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G205M draws 16W versus the Quadro FX 350's 189W — a 168.8% difference. The GeForce G205M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G205M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce G205M	Quadro FX 350
TDP	16W-92%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	5.8+1060%	0.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce G205M (2016 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce G205M	Quadro FX 350
MSRP	—	$199
Codename	GM108	GT200B
Release	March 25 2016	November 11 2008
Ranking	#864	#815

Search GeForce G205M on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.