Quadro FX 350 vs Radeon X1650 Pro
Quadro FX 350
Popular choices:
Radeon X1650 Pro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 350 is positioned at rank 385 and the Radeon X1650 Pro is on rank 334, so the Radeon X1650 Pro offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 350
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1650 Pro
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1650 Pro is significantly newer (2023 vs 2008). The Radeon X1650 Pro likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 350 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon X1650 Pro offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 350 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 350 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $15 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1.2% better value per dollar than the Radeon X1650 Pro.
| Insight | Quadro FX 350 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 350 and Radeon X1650 Pro
Quadro FX 350
The Quadro FX 350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 86 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Radeon X1650 Pro
The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 350 scores 86 and the Radeon X1650 Pro reaches 85 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 350 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon X1650 Pro uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 350) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro).
| Feature | Quadro FX 350 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 86+1% | 85 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 2560+967% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 350 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 350 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 Pro has 512 MB. The Radeon X1650 Pro offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 350 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 350 draws 189W versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 250W — a 27.8% difference. The Quadro FX 350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 350) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 350 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W-24% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5+67% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 350 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon X1650 Pro launched at $100 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.7 (Quadro FX 350) vs 5.7 (Radeon X1650 Pro) — the Radeon X1650 Pro offers 0% better value. The Radeon X1650 Pro is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 350 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $100-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.7 | 5.7 |
| Codename | GT200B | Navi 22 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #815 | #92 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 350 and Radeon X1650 Pro
