Mobility Radeon X1600 vs Quadro FX 350

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon X1600 vs Quadro FX 350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon X1600 vs Quadro FX 350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon X1600

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 334.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 350

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
306.1% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Mobility Radeon X1600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 7% in PassMark G3D (92 vs 86), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Mobility Radeon X1600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 256 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 40nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Mobility Radeon X1600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 334.5% (1.9 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Mobility Radeon X1600 vs Quadro FX 350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon X1600

The Mobility Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.

Quadro FX 350

The Quadro FX 350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 86 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon X1600 scores 92 versus the Quadro FX 350's 86 — the Mobility Radeon X1600 leads by 7%. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 350 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350).

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1600	Quadro FX 350
G3D Mark Score	92+7%	86
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	800+233%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS+80%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	80+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1600	Quadro FX 350
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon X1600 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 350 carries 128 MB. Mobility Radeon X1600 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1600 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350.

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1600	Quadro FX 350
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB+100%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon X1600 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 350's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1600	Quadro FX 350
TDP	50W-74%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	1.8+260%	0.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon X1600 came in at $49, while the Quadro FX 350 launched at $199. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon X1600 was 75.4% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 0.4 (Quadro FX 350) — the Mobility Radeon X1600 offers 375% better value. The newer card here is Mobility Radeon X1600 (2010 vs 2008).

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1600	Quadro FX 350
MSRP	$49-75%	$199
Performance per Dollar	1.9+375%	0.4
Codename	Broadway	GT200B
Release	January 7 2010	November 11 2008
Ranking	#846	#815

Search Mobility Radeon X1600 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.