GeForce 9400M G vs Mobility Radeon X1600

NVIDIA

GeForce 9400M G

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon X1600

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 9400M G vs Mobility Radeon X1600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9400M G vs Mobility Radeon X1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9400M G

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Mobility Radeon X1600

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $1 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 9400M G is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (94 vs 92), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9400M G is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9400M G makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 more expensive on MSRP at $50 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.1% (1.9 vs 1.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 9400M G vs Mobility Radeon X1600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9400M G

The GeForce 9400M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 94 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon X1600

The Mobility Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9400M G scores 94 and the Mobility Radeon X1600 reaches 92 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9400M G is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon X1600 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9400M G) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400M G) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1600).

FeatureGeForce 9400M GMobility Radeon X1600
G3D Mark Score
94+2%
92
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9032 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS+24%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
192 KB+140%
80 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9400M G gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon X1600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9400M GMobility Radeon X1600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9400M G and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1600. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9400M G) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon X1600) — the GeForce 9400M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9400M GMobility Radeon X1600
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9400M G) vs 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce 9400M GMobility Radeon X1600
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)+23%
9.0c
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9400M G) vs Avivo (Mobility Radeon X1600). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP3) vs Avivo.

FeatureGeForce 9400M GMobility Radeon X1600
Encoder
None
Avivo
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP3)
Avivo
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9400M G draws 33W versus the Mobility Radeon X1600's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 9400M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9400M G) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce 9400M GMobility Radeon X1600
TDP
33W-34%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
1mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
2.8+56%
1.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9400M G came in at $50, while the Mobility Radeon X1600 launched at $49. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon X1600 was 2% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GeForce 9400M G) vs 1.9 (Mobility Radeon X1600) — the Mobility Radeon X1600 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9400M G (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce 9400M GMobility Radeon X1600
MSRP
$50
$49-2%
Performance per Dollar
1.9
1.9
Codename
GM108
Broadway
Release
March 13 2015
January 7 2010
Ranking
#847
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.