
GeForce 9400M G

Mobility Radeon X1600
GeForce 9400M G vs Mobility Radeon X1600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9400M G vs Mobility Radeon X1600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce 9400M G vs Mobility Radeon X1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9400M G
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Mobility Radeon X1600
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9400M G vs Mobility Radeon X1600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9400M G
The GeForce 9400M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 94 points.

Mobility Radeon X1600
The Mobility Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9400M G scores 94 and the Mobility Radeon X1600 reaches 92 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9400M G is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon X1600 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9400M G) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400M G) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1600).
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 94+2% | 92 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+24% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+140% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9400M G gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon X1600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9400M G and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1600. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9400M G) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon X1600) — the GeForce 9400M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9400M G) vs 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+23% | 9.0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9400M G) vs Avivo (Mobility Radeon X1600). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP3) vs Avivo.
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Avivo |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP3) | Avivo |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9400M G draws 33W versus the Mobility Radeon X1600's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 9400M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9400M G) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-34% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.8+56% | 1.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9400M G came in at $50, while the Mobility Radeon X1600 launched at $49. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon X1600 was 2% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GeForce 9400M G) vs 1.9 (Mobility Radeon X1600) — the Mobility Radeon X1600 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9400M G (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $49-2% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Codename | GM108 | Broadway |
| Release | March 13 2015 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #847 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














