
Mobility Radeon HD 2400

Mobility Radeon X1600
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 vs Mobility Radeon X1600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 vs Mobility Radeon X1600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 vs Mobility Radeon X1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌61.2% HIGHER MSRP$79 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
Mobility Radeon X1600
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 64.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 vs Mobility Radeon X1600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 90 points.

Mobility Radeon X1600
The Mobility Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 scores 90 and the Mobility Radeon X1600 reaches 92 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is built on TeraScale while the Mobility Radeon X1600 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1600).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 90 | 92+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+27% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+100% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1600.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0+11% | 9.0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs Avivo (Mobility Radeon X1600). Decoder: UVD 1.0 vs Avivo.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo HD | Avivo |
| Decoder | UVD 1.0 | Avivo |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 draws 30W versus the Mobility Radeon X1600's 50W — a 50% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.0+67% | 1.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 came in at $79, while the Mobility Radeon X1600 launched at $49. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon X1600 was 38% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs 1.9 (Mobility Radeon X1600) — the Mobility Radeon X1600 offers 72.7% better value. The newer card here is Mobility Radeon X1600 (2010 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79 | $49-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.1 | 1.9+73% |
| Codename | M98 | Broadway |
| Release | January 9 2009 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #927 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














