GeForce 6600 vs Mobility Radeon HD 2400
GeForce 6600
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 6600 is positioned at rank 362 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is on rank 687, so the GeForce 6600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6600
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6600.
| Insight | GeForce 6600 | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 holds the technical lead. Priced at $1 (vs $10), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 946.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 6600 | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+946.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($10) | ✅More affordable ($1) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6600 and Mobility Radeon HD 2400
GeForce 6600
The GeForce 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 86 points. Launch price was $229.
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 90 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 6600 scores 86 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 reaches 90 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6600 is built on Kepler while the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce 6600) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400). Raw compute: 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce 6600) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 2400).
| Feature | GeForce 6600 | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 86 | 90+5% |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 960+20% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.981 TFLOPS+125% | 0.88 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 160 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6600 | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce 6600) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) — the GeForce 6600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6600 | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6600) vs 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6600 | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0+11% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3+57% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6600) vs Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2400). Decoder: PureVideo vs UVD 1.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6600) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400).
| Feature | GeForce 6600 | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | Avivo HD |
| Decoder | PureVideo | UVD 1.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6600 draws 140W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2400's 30W — a 129.4% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6600) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 183mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce 6600 | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W | 30W-79% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 183mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6 | 3.0+400% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 6600 launched at $270 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 launched at $79 and now averages $1. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 costs 90% less ($9 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.6 (GeForce 6600) vs 90.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) — the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 offers 946.5% better value. The GeForce 6600 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce 6600 | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $270 | $79-71% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $1-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.6 | 90.0+947% |
| Codename | GK106 | M98 |
| Release | September 6 2012 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #490 | #927 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 6600 and Mobility Radeon HD 2400
