GeForce 6600 vs Mobility Radeon X1600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6600 vs Mobility Radeon X1600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6600 vs Mobility Radeon X1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6600

2012

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
451% HIGHER MSRP
$270 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($270 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌180% higher power demand at 140W vs 50W.
❌18200% longer card at 183mm vs 1mm.

Mobility Radeon X1600

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $221 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
✅Delivers 489.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 140W, a 90W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 183mm, a 182mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Mobility Radeon X1600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 7% in PassMark G3D (92 vs 86), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 6600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Mobility Radeon X1600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $221 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $270, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 489.5% (1.9 vs 0.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon X1600 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 6600 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 6600 vs Mobility Radeon X1600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6600

The GeForce 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 86 points. Launch price was $229.

Mobility Radeon X1600

The Mobility Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6600 scores 86 versus the Mobility Radeon X1600's 92 — the Mobility Radeon X1600 leads by 7%. The GeForce 6600 is built on Kepler while the Mobility Radeon X1600 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce 6600) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce 6600) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1600).

Feature	GeForce 6600	Mobility Radeon X1600
G3D Mark Score	86	92+7%
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	960+20%	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.981 TFLOPS+77%	1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	80+100%	40
L1 Cache	80 KB	80 KB
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 6600 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon X1600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 6600	Mobility Radeon X1600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6600 and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1600. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce 6600) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X1600) — the GeForce 6600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 6600	Mobility Radeon X1600
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6600) vs 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce 6600	Mobility Radeon X1600
DirectX	9.0c	9.0c
Max Displays	2	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6600) vs Avivo (Mobility Radeon X1600). Decoder: PureVideo vs Avivo.

Feature	GeForce 6600	Mobility Radeon X1600
Encoder	No	Avivo
Decoder	PureVideo	Avivo
Codecs	MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6600 draws 140W versus the Mobility Radeon X1600's 50W — a 94.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6600) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 183mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce 6600	Mobility Radeon X1600
TDP	140W	50W-64%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	183mm	1mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.6	1.8+200%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 6600 came in at $270, while the Mobility Radeon X1600 launched at $49. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon X1600 was 81.9% cheaper ($221 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GeForce 6600) vs 1.9 (Mobility Radeon X1600) — the Mobility Radeon X1600 offers 533.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 6600 (2012 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce 6600	Mobility Radeon X1600
MSRP	$270	$49-82%
Performance per Dollar	0.3	1.9+533%
Codename	GK106	Broadway
Release	September 6 2012	January 7 2010
Ranking	#490	#846

Search GeForce 6600 on Amazon

Search Mobility Radeon X1600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.