GeForce 6600 vs Radeon X1650 Pro

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6600 vs Radeon X1650 Pro FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6600 vs Radeon X1650 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6600

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 140W instead of 250W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
170% HIGHER MSRP
$270 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($270 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon X1650 Pro

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
✅Delivers 166.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌78.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 140W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 6600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (86 vs 85), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon X1650 Pro is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon X1650 Pro makes the most sense to buy today. It is $170 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $270, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 166.9% (0.8 vs 0.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce 6600 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 6600 vs Radeon X1650 Pro Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6600

The GeForce 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 86 points. Launch price was $229.

Radeon X1650 Pro

The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 6600 scores 86 and the Radeon X1650 Pro reaches 85 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6600 is built on Kepler while the Radeon X1650 Pro uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce 6600) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 2581 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 6600	Radeon X1650 Pro
G3D Mark Score	86+1%	85
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	960	2560+167%
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	2581 MHz+150%
ROPs	24	64+167%
TMUs	80	160+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 6600 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1650 Pro leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 6600	Radeon X1650 Pro
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6600 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 Pro carries 512 MB. Radeon X1650 Pro gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6600 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 Pro.

Feature	GeForce 6600	Radeon X1650 Pro
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6600 draws 140W versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 250W — a 56.4% difference. The GeForce 6600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6600) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 6600	Radeon X1650 Pro
TDP	140W-44%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	183mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.6+100%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 6600 came in at $270, while the Radeon X1650 Pro launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon X1650 Pro was 63% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GeForce 6600) vs 0.8 (Radeon X1650 Pro) — the Radeon X1650 Pro offers 166.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1650 Pro (2023 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce 6600	Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP	$270	$100-63%
Performance per Dollar	0.3	0.8+167%
Codename	GK106	Navi 22
Release	September 6 2012	October 17 2023
Ranking	#490	#92

Search GeForce 6600 on Amazon

Search Radeon X1650 Pro on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.