
GeForce 6600 vs Quadro FX 370

GeForce 6600
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 6600 is positioned at rank 362 and the Quadro FX 370 is on rank 373, so the GeForce 6600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6600
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 370
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 6600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 370.
| Insight | GeForce 6600 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 6600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 6600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $500), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 5019% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 6600 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5019%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6600 and Quadro FX 370

GeForce 6600
The GeForce 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 86 points. Launch price was $229.

Quadro FX 370
The Quadro FX 370 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 6600 scores 86 and the Quadro FX 370 reaches 84 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6600 is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 370 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce 6600) vs 240 (Quadro FX 370). Raw compute: 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce 6600) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 370).
| Feature | GeForce 6600 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 86+2% | 84 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 960+300% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.981 TFLOPS+218% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6600 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce 6600) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 370) — the GeForce 6600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6600 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6600) vs 10.0 (Quadro FX 370). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6600 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0+11% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6600) vs None (Quadro FX 370). Decoder: PureVideo vs PureVideo 2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6600) vs MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 370).
| Feature | GeForce 6600 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo | PureVideo 2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6600 draws 140W versus the Quadro FX 370's 189W — a 29.8% difference. The GeForce 6600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6600) vs 350W (Quadro FX 370). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 183mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 6600 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W-26% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 183mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6+50% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 6600 launched at $270 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Quadro FX 370 launched at $129 and now averages $500. The GeForce 6600 costs 98% less ($490 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.6 (GeForce 6600) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 370) — the GeForce 6600 offers 4200% better value. The GeForce 6600 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 6600 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $270 | $129-52% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-98% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.6+4200% | 0.2 |
| Codename | GK106 | GT200B |
| Release | September 6 2012 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #490 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











