GeForce 6600 vs Quadro FX 360M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6600 vs Quadro FX 360M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6600 vs Quadro FX 360M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6600

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($270 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 140W instead of 189W, a 49W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 360M

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
❌35% higher power demand at 189W vs 140W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 360M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (87 vs 86), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 6600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 6600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro FX 360M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 6600 vs Quadro FX 360M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6600

The GeForce 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 86 points. Launch price was $229.

Quadro FX 360M

The Quadro FX 360M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 87 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 6600 scores 86 and the Quadro FX 360M reaches 87 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6600 is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 360M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce 6600) vs 240 (Quadro FX 360M). Raw compute: 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce 6600) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 360M).

Feature	GeForce 6600	Quadro FX 360M
G3D Mark Score	86	87+1%
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	960+300%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.981 TFLOPS+218%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	80	80
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 6600 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 360M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 6600	Quadro FX 360M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6600 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 360M. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce 6600) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 360M) — the GeForce 6600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 6600	Quadro FX 360M
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6600 draws 140W versus the Quadro FX 360M's 189W — a 29.8% difference. The GeForce 6600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6600) vs 350W (Quadro FX 360M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 6600	Quadro FX 360M
TDP	140W-26%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	183mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.6+20%	0.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 6600 (2012 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 6600	Quadro FX 360M
MSRP	$270	—
Codename	GK106	GT200B
Release	September 6 2012	November 11 2008
Ranking	#490	#815

Search GeForce 6600 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 360M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.