Mobility Radeon HD 2400 vs Radeon X1650 Pro
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Popular choices:
Radeon X1650 Pro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is positioned at rank 687 and the Radeon X1650 Pro is on rank 334, so the Radeon X1650 Pro offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1650 Pro
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1650 Pro is significantly newer (2023 vs 2009). The Radeon X1650 Pro likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon X1650 Pro offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1 versus $15 for the Radeon X1650 Pro, it costs 93% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1488.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1488.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($1) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 2400 and Radeon X1650 Pro
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 90 points.
Radeon X1650 Pro
The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 scores 90 versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 85 — the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 leads by 5.9%. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon X1650 Pro uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 90+6% | 85 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2560+220% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 160+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 Pro has 512 MB. The Radeon X1650 Pro offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 draws 30W versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 250W — a 157.1% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-88% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.0+900% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $1, while the Radeon X1650 Pro launched at $100 and now averages $15. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 costs 93.3% less ($14 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 90.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs 5.7 (Radeon X1650 Pro) — the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 offers 1478.9% better value. The Radeon X1650 Pro is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79-21% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1-93% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 90.0+1479% | 5.7 |
| Codename | M98 | Navi 22 |
| Release | January 9 2009 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #927 | #92 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 2400 and Radeon X1650 Pro
