Mobility Radeon X1600 vs Quadro FX 370M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is positioned at rank 650 and the Quadro FX 370M is on rank 354, so the Quadro FX 370M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1600

#639

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

5775%

#641

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

5235%

#642

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

5221%

#646

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

4748%

#647

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

4715%

#649

GeForce 9400M G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

100%

#650

Mobility Radeon X1600

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

100%

#651

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

100%

#652

GeForce 9600M GS

MSRP: $70|Avg: $20

99%

#653

Mobility Radeon HD 4200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $45

99%

#654

Mobility Radeon HD 3470

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

99%

#655

GeForce 8800 GT

MSRP: $249|Avg: $25

98%

#656

GeForce 8400

MSRP: $45|Avg: $5

96%

#657

GeForce 9800M GTS

MSRP: $200|Avg: $15

95%

#658

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7600M Dual

MSRP: $250|Avg: $50

95%

#659

GeForce 8600 GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

95%

#660

Radeon HD 2900 GT

MSRP: $170|Avg: $15

91%

#661

Radeon HD 8280E

MSRP: $150|Avg: $110

91%

#662

Radeon R5 M420

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

89%

#663

Mobility Radeon HD 2600

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

89%

#664

Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 370M

#339

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

15885%

#354

Quadro FX 370M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#355

FirePro 3D V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

98%

#356

Quadro FX 580

MSRP: $199|Avg: $500

98%

#358

GRID M60-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

97%

#359

FireStream 9270

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20

96%

#360

Quadro 400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $500

95%

#361

FirePro 2260

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

95%

#362

Quadro FX 380 LP

MSRP: $169|Avg: $15

92%

#364

Quadro FX 1800

MSRP: $489|Avg: $100

87%

#365

FirePro 3D V8700

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229

86%

#366

FirePro 3D V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80

86%

#367

Quadro 5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100

85%

#368

FirePro V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $20

84%

#369

FirePro V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 370M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X1600.

Insight	Mobility Radeon X1600	Quadro FX 370M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 370M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Mobility Radeon X1600 Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 370M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X1600 and Quadro FX 370M

Mobility Radeon X1600

The Mobility Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.

Quadro FX 370M

The Quadro FX 370M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 93 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon X1600 scores 92 and the Quadro FX 370M reaches 93 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 370M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 240 (Quadro FX 370M). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 370M).

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1600	Quadro FX 370M
G3D Mark Score	92	93+1%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	800+233%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS+80%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	80+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1600	Quadro FX 370M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1600	Quadro FX 370M
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon X1600 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 370M's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 350W (Quadro FX 370M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.