
Mobility Radeon X1600

Radeon HD 3000
Mobility Radeon X1600 vs Radeon HD 3000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Mobility Radeon X1600 vs Radeon HD 3000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Mobility Radeon X1600 vs Radeon HD 3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Mobility Radeon X1600
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 186W, a 136W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 3000
2011Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌272% higher power demand at 186W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon X1600 vs Radeon HD 3000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon X1600
The Mobility Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.

Radeon HD 3000
The Radeon HD 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 96 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon X1600 scores 92 and the Radeon HD 3000 reaches 96 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 3000 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 3000). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3000).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 92 | 96+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 1280+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 1.92 TFLOPS+71% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 320 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon X1600 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3000 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 3000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1600 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3000. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 3000) — the Radeon HD 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 3000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0+11% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs UVD (Radeon HD 3000). Decoder: Avivo vs UVD.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo | UVD |
| Decoder | Avivo | UVD |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X1600 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 3000's 186W — a 115.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-73% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.8+260% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Mobility Radeon X1600 came in at $49, while the Radeon HD 3000 launched at $50. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon X1600 was 2% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 1.9 (Radeon HD 3000) — the Radeon HD 3000 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 3000 (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-2% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Codename | Broadway | Cayman |
| Release | January 7 2010 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #846 | #598 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














