Mobility Radeon X1600 vs Radeon HD 3000
Mobility Radeon X1600
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 3000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is positioned at rank 650 and the Radeon HD 3000 is on rank 316, so the Radeon HD 3000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1600
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 3000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X1600.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 3000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 3000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 56.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+56.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X1600 and Radeon HD 3000
Mobility Radeon X1600
The Mobility Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.
Radeon HD 3000
The Radeon HD 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 96 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon X1600 scores 92 and the Radeon HD 3000 reaches 96 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 3000 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 3000). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3000).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 92 | 96+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 1280+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 1.92 TFLOPS+71% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 320 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon X1600 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3000 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 3000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 3000) — the Radeon HD 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 3000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0+11% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs UVD (Radeon HD 3000). Decoder: Avivo vs UVD.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo | UVD |
| Decoder | Avivo | UVD |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X1600 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 3000's 186W — a 115.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-73% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.8+260% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X1600 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon HD 3000 launched at $50 and now averages $10. The Radeon HD 3000 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.1 (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 9.6 (Radeon HD 3000) — the Radeon HD 3000 offers 57.4% better value. The Radeon HD 3000 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-2% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 9.6+57% |
| Codename | Broadway | Cayman |
| Release | January 7 2010 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #846 | #598 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon X1600 and Radeon HD 3000
