Quadro FX 3500 vs GeForce 7900 GT
Quadro FX 3500
Popular choices:
GeForce 7900 GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3500 is positioned at rank 408 and the GeForce 7900 GT is on rank 706, so the Quadro FX 3500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3500
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7900 GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 3500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 7900 GT.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3500 | GeForce 7900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 7900 GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 7900 GT holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $1,599), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 2494.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3500 | GeForce 7900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2494.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,599) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3500 and GeForce 7900 GT
Quadro FX 3500
The Quadro FX 3500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $3,499.
GeForce 7900 GT
The GeForce 7900 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 258 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 3500 scores 265 and the GeForce 7900 GT reaches 258 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3500 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 7900 GT uses G9x, both on 55 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3500) vs 224 (GeForce 7900 GT).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3500 | GeForce 7900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 265+3% | 258 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 240+7% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3500 | GeForce 7900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3500 | GeForce 7900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3500 draws 189W versus the GeForce 7900 GT's 150W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 7900 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3500) vs 350W (GeForce 7900 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3500 | GeForce 7900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 150W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 198mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4 | 1.7+21% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 3500 launched at $1599 MSRP and currently averages $1599, while the GeForce 7900 GT launched at $299 and now averages $60. The GeForce 7900 GT costs 96.2% less ($1539 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (Quadro FX 3500) vs 4.3 (GeForce 7900 GT) — the GeForce 7900 GT offers 2050% better value.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3500 | GeForce 7900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1599 | $299-81% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1599 | $60-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 4.3+2050% |
| Codename | GT200B | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | November 11 2008 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #815 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 3500 and GeForce 7900 GT
