Quadro FX 3500M vs Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3500M vs Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3500M vs Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3500M

2008

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro FX 3500M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌2600% higher power demand at 189W vs 7W.

Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 189W, a 182W reduction.
✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 3500M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.8% in PassMark G3D (306 vs 292), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 3500M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 3500M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro FX 3500M vs Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3500M

The Quadro FX 3500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 306 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 292 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3500M scores 306 and the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU reaches 292 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU
G3D Mark Score	306+5%	292
Process Node	55 nm	5 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3500M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU carries 0 MB. Quadro FX 3500M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3500M and System on the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3500M draws 189W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU's 7W — a 185.7% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3500M) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU
TDP	189W	7W-96%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	1.6	41.7+2506%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU (2018 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GT200B	—
Release	November 11 2008	December 6 2018
Ranking	#815	#860

Search Quadro FX 3500M on Amazon

Search Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.