Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs Quadro FX 3500M

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 600

2014Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3500M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs Quadro FX 3500M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs Quadro FX 3500M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 600

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 189W, a 174W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 3500M

2008

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Intel UHD Graphics 600 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro FX 3500M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1160% higher power demand at 189W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Intel UHD Graphics 600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (312 vs 306), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 3500M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel UHD Graphics 600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Intel UHD Graphics 600 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 3500M has the stronger long-term case.

Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs Quadro FX 3500M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 600

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3500M

The Quadro FX 3500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 306 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 scores 312 and the Quadro FX 3500M reaches 306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Quadro FX 3500M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3500M). Raw compute: 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3500M).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 600Quadro FX 3500M
G3D Mark Score
312+2%
306
Architecture
Generation 8.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
192
240+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4032 TFLOPS
0.6221 TFLOPS+54%
ROPs
3
32+967%
TMUs
24
80+233%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 600Quadro FX 3500M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3500M carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 3500M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 600 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3500M.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 600Quadro FX 3500M
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 9.0c (Quadro FX 3500M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 600Quadro FX 3500M
DirectX
12+33%
9.0c
OpenGL
4.6+119%
2.1
Max Displays
3+200%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QSV (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs None (Quadro FX 3500M). Decoder: QSV vs VP1. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs MPEG-2,WMV9 (Quadro FX 3500M).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 600Quadro FX 3500M
Encoder
QSV
None
Decoder
QSV
VP1
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
MPEG-2,WMV9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 draws 15W versus the Quadro FX 3500M's 189W — a 170.6% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3500M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 55°C vs 75°C.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 600Quadro FX 3500M
TDP
15W-92%
189W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
55°C-27%
75°C
Perf/Watt
20.8+1200%
1.6
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 600 (2014 vs 2008).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 600Quadro FX 3500M
MSRP
$0
Codename
Broadwell GT2
GT200B
Release
September 5 2014
November 11 2008
Ranking
#703
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.